The Case for Tenants’ Right to Counsel
April 18, 2024Feature Article(Source)
In 1963, the Supreme Court established that the right to counsel in criminal cases is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution in Gideon v. Wainwright, meaning criminal defendants will be appointed a lawyer if they cannot afford one. On the other hand, there is no constitutionally protected right to counsel in civil cases generally. Supreme Court jurisprudence has created a presumption against the civil right to counsel in matters where “physical liberty is not at risk.” However, some states have laws that provide for appointment of counsel in certain civil cases, such as eviction, guardianship, or domestic violence.
There are significant barriers to the access to justice for civil litigants, and one primary issue is that legal representation can be difficult to afford. In New York, lawyers on average charge an hourly rate of $358. Pro se litigants consistently have much lower success rates in court than their represented counterparts. For federal civil litigation, about 27% of all cases have at least one pro se plaintiff or defendant. Additionally, 90% of landlords are represented in eviction cases, while only 10% of tenants have legal representation.
Since low-income tenants in particular often appear in court without representation, they are much more likely to face eviction. Landlords use a myriad of tactics to scare tenants who may not know their legal rights. One common practice is to lock tenants out of their homes without an eviction order in a “DIY eviction”, most never facing any legal consequences. Advocacy on the local and state levels to protect tenants from exploitation by their landlord is growing, but change is fundamentally unlikely without structural changes to the legal system. One way that some groups have pursued this is by passing local ordinances that secure tenant’s right to counsel. For example, Cleveland has passed a law guaranteeing a right to counsel in eviction cases.
As proven in both literature and local governments, guaranteeing tenants a right to counsel protects low-income communities from illegal evictions, and has the potential to protect them from other abuses. For example, right to counsel legislation in New York City increased tenant representation in court from 1% to 56%. With the shortage of affordable housing in the United States, tenants facing eviction have very few options to turn to if they want to live elsewhere. Additionally, once an eviction is on a renter’s record, it can negatively impact their credit score for up to seven years; an eviction record will also likely prevent a renter from being able to secure housing in the future, as most landlords view these records as a part of a renter’s application. On the state level, the first step to be taken should be passing laws that guarantee the right to counsel for eviction cases as a starting point. However, it can and should later be expanded to all landlord-tenant legal proceedings.
There are practical issues that would arise with the passage of these laws; for example, it would likely further burden already-struggling court systems. Moreover, government funding would be necessary to actually secure lawyers for all litigants who need one. However, people should not be deprived of their right to access the court system because of these barriers. Tenant’s right to counsel can also be used as a way to combat the increasing homeless rates across the country. Addressing these practical issues requires collaboration between stakeholders and ongoing evaluation of the effectiveness of legal representation programs for tenants. Despite these challenges, guaranteeing tenants the right to counsel can be a valuable tool for promoting fairness, justice, and human rights in the housing sector.
Suggested Citation: Hannah Young, The Case for Tenants’ Right to Counsel, Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol’y, The Issue Spotter (April 18, 2024), https://live-journal-of-law-and-public-policy.pantheonsite.io/the-case-for-tenants-right-to-counsel.
You may also like
- November 2024
- October 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- October 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010