Is Daily Fantasy Sports Gambling?
January 11, 2016Archives . Feature . Feature Img . Recent Stories ArticleIn August of 2015, Forbes published an article highlighting the fast-growing daily fantasy sports (DFS) industry. The rise of fantasy sports and most specifically fantasy football has been truly remarkable. In recent years, fantasy football has absolutely exploded with over 30 million Americans playing fantasy football annually. Fueled by over one billion dollars in venture capital and powered by the internet, fantasy football has been rapidly evolving. It is this evolution that has, in many ways, shaped the controversy surrounding daily fantasy sports sites.
Traditional Fantasy Sports:
Traditional fantasy football gives players a chance to serve as team owners/managers and compete in a “league” of friends. The fantasy season begins with a “draft” process where each participant is permitted to select players for their team. In the standard league, each “owner” is required to fill a team roster. Each week of the football season, owners are matched up against an opposing owner. Points are then allocated based on various athletic achievements made by the players on their team. The winner of the weekly matchup is the team with the most points. The challenges continue until a winner is declared at the end of the football season.
In 2006, Congress passed the Internet Gambling Prohibition and Enforcement Act. At the time, Fantasy Sports were played as traditional season-long competitions with very low financial stakes. As a result, the legislation’s definitions section carved out an exception, which permitted fantasy sports. This was largely based on the theory that fantasy success involves a requisite level of skill, distinguishing the activity from gambling. However, this legislative carve out was established prior to the rise of daily fantasy.
Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS):
Much like traditional fantasy sports, daily fantasy games allow participants to act as team owners who select individual athletes for their teams. Daily match ups however, have much shorter durations; ‘daily’ fantasy events take place over a period of less than one week, often occurring over a single day. Additionally, entry fees for these contests can exceed $10,000. Thanks to hundreds of millions in advertising money, these daily fantasy matches have become extraordinarily popular.
Controversy Surrounding DFS:
In recent months, the world of Daily Fantasy Sports has been riddled with controversy and legal concerns. From Money Laundering Concerns to a highly publicized Insider Scandal, DFS has presented a growing list of potential issues. Amid these growing concerns, regulators have begun to consider whether the evolved ‘daily fantasy’ constitutes unlawful gambling, ineligible for legislative carve out. Most notably, on November 10, 2015 the New York State Attorney General issued a cease-and-desist order to FanDuel and DraftKings, ordering them to stop taking entries in New York.
The story is evolving quickly. On December 11, 2015, New York Supreme Court Justice Manuel Mendez granted Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s request for a preliminary injunction against FanDuel and DraftKings. A challenge to the preliminary injunction was immediately filed and later that same day, appellate Justice Paul G. Feinman granted a stay on the injunction. This stay will allow the two sites to continue to operate in New York, at least until the first week of January 2016 (when they will appear in front of a full panel of judges).
DFS: Skill or Chance?
Attorney General Schneiderman’s argument identifies the key question facing the court: does daily fantasy include a “material degree” of chance/luck so as to constitute a game of chance rather than a game of skill? Some insiders, like NFL legend Joe Namath, poker professional Andy Frankenberger and television host John Oliver, think the answer is clear – daily fantasy is gambling. Proponents of this viewpoint point to the impact DFS has on gambling addicts and instances where a single athlete’s strategic decision (outside of the fantasy player’s control) has a costly impact on fantasy outcomes.
On the other hand, there are skilled players who spend their entire day ‘working’ on their rosters with great success thanks to carefully crafted predictive algorithms and data modeling. And the group of successful fantasy professionals is very small relative to the overall fantasy user base; for instance, in the first half of the 2015 Major League Baseball (MLB) season, 1.3% of the fantasy players took home 91% of the DFS profits, suggesting skilled players are incredibly advantaged. In an interview with Fortune, DraftKings lawyer, David Boies, demonstrated confidence in the legal merits of his client’s position noting the level of skill necessary to succeed in daily fantasy.
Yet a win in court may still have negative implications on the daily fantasy industry. As University of Georgia Professor, Jeffrey Dofman points out in an opinion piece for Forbes “Potentially, [DraftKings and FanDuel] could prove their games are legal at the same time as they kill their business model. Providing clear statistical evidence of the skill involved in these games might also serve to educate the general public how little chance they have of actually winning.” Moreover, subsequent legislative action could restrict or further regulate the daily fantasy industry.
No one can say definitively what will happen in the coming months but one thing is for sure, the stakes are high. The ultimate conclusion to the New York State litigation will likely have far reaching implications across the country. Thus for the time being, the controversy surrounding daily fantasy will undoubtedly remain a hot topic at the intersection of law, business, sports, and politics.
You may also like
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- October 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010