A Watershed Moment
September 20, 2011Student Blogs ArticleBy James Hicks.
Elected officials and the media overwhelmingly presume that flooding is Mother Nature acting alone. In the wake of record flood damage in the northeast after Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee, policy makers should take account of the fact that particular types of land use and drainage magnify flooding. Rivers flood worse than they would naturally because owners of impervious surfaces—including most roofs, driveways, patios, parking lots, sidewalks, and roads—discharge stormwater, which would otherwise become groundwater, into gutters, curbs, ditches, and storm sewers that channel the water directly to streams and rivers.
Because stormwater carries pollution with it (and, in combined storm and waste sewer systems, feces), Congress in 1987 amended the Clean Water Act so that the EPA and the states could require permits for stormwater discharge from industry, developers, and municipal operators of large storm sewer systems (“MS4s”). To comply with its MS4 discharge permit, a city must administer a local stormwater management program (“SWMP”) in its jurisdiction, including education, planning, illicit discharge detection and elimination, SWPPP enforcement, and “good housekeeping” to reduce stormwater pollution from public operations.
For cities, the most cost-effective “good housekeeping” measures are stormwater best management practices (BMPs) that retain or infiltrate stormwater. If authorized by their state government, cities can fund BMP maintenance by establishing a drainage district in their jurisdiction and imposing a stormwater utility fee on landowners based on their amount of connected impervious surface; and they can encourage landowners to build their own BMPs by offering an exemption to those who do.
The problem and limitation of targeting cities is that a city is invariably a part of a larger watershed or drainage basin. It is unfair for city landowners to pay the cost of catching not only their runoff but also the runoff of landowners upstream of city boundaries. Targeting cities is also inefficient and ineffective: stormwater catchments are far cheaper outside of cities where there is open land, such as along rural roads. Without better rural stormwater management, the rivers will become lakes again with the next big storm, and rural areas will lack the groundwater they need during the next drought.
State legislators can address water quality, water supply, and flood protection by explicitly authorizing basin-wide drainage districts like the Tualatin River Watershed’s Clean Water Services. The EPA or state regulators can remove political barriers by threatening to designate all major dischargers in a drainage basin, encouraging them to form, by inter-municipal agreement, a basin-wide drainage district with a collective discharge permit. With its costs and services distributed among all dischargers in a basin, such a special district could mitigate water pollution, drought, and flooding fairly and cost-effectively.
You may also like
3 comments
- November 2024
- October 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- October 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Thought provoking. Engaging. Mr. Hicks, ever the policy wonk, has nailed it again.
I’m curious how drainage planning can be addressed in areas that rarely see flooding? Like the flooding in upstate New York was either the first time ever or first in a hundred years, so how can semi-rural/rural areas not prone to flooding improve their watershed management?
Thanks for this beautiful information and this site. It is helpful.